referring to AVP as 'dog poo' is like referring to AIDS as 'a minor cold', there is no word, term, or phrase that can do justice to the debacle and stain on humanity that is known as AVP. You couldn't even refer to AVP as 'Cinematic AIDS' and do it's horribleness any justice.
G’morning
…You think it [AVP films] would have been better if they were based on the comics/novel? I don’t. but I guess I’m weird that way, as I’m no fan of the comics or perry’s novels.
~Estelle
I mean it might not have been canon that was generall liked or something, but at least people were familiar with it in some manner. The first 2 Predator movies were very well in terms of establishing without blatently saying the very basics of the Predator belief system, and In P2 you realize its a big huge alien race and not just 1 lone extraterrestrial who likes to **** around on Earth every once in a while.This is what gets me… what IS canon? It’s so confusing as I’ve heard some say the films, novels and comics were all canon and then there are others that say, not so. I.D.K, maybe I’m just being bull-headed… But in my eyes the comics and perry’s novels are basically are “made up stuff” and are no better than the AVP films. I personally don’t consider them ( perry books/comics) to be canon at all. The two, in my eyes takes the original Predator concept and turns it upside down.. it’s so damn different from the original pred and the pred. bible ( the novel written by Paul Monet) That I can’t swallow it. But I do see what you are saying.. as everyone is familiar with the comics and perry's books, that, had the film gone that route it would be more appreciated. You do have a point there
~Estelle
referring to AVP as 'dog poo' is like referring to AIDS as 'a minor cold', there is no word, term, or phrase that can do justice to the debacle and stain on humanity that is known as AVP. You couldn't even refer to AVP as 'Cinematic AIDS' and do it's horribleness any justice.