Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="imurme" data-source="post: 3608710" data-attributes="member: 16512">Hey all, I would like to second the request for more reference for the decals mentioned above by Robert...as some of you may know, I am one of the 'guys' that has been working on a studio quality set of falcon decals...but what is holding me up is that we still have a few decals that are unknowns and a few others that we have little or no reference images to work from...so if ANYONE has better scans, photos, kit ID's, etc. on any of these please let me know, thanks...still need better images of this decal (#113 on tracker)[ATTACH]461457[/ATTACH]still need high-res scans of these decal sheets, specifically need the cockpit and side panels from sheets (#108, #110, and #111 on tracker)[ATTACH]461470[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461471[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461472[/ATTACH]Revell #H289 - 1/48 McDonnell-Douglas F-4E or F-4F Phantom II - USAF or JG74 Luftwaffe[ATTACH]461469[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]461475[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461474[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461473[/ATTACH]Revell #H-182 - 1/32 F-4E  Phantom II, 1976 Issue  or  Revell #H-178 -  1/32 Luttwaffe F-4F Phantom, 1975 Issue any help with these is appreciated (#25, #88, and #141 on tracker)[ATTACH]461476[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461477[/ATTACH][ATTACH]461479[/ATTACH]imurme</blockquote>

This thread is more than 6 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.