What always erked me about this movie was the credit at the end... "Kong was built by Carlo Rambaldi, with some contributions by Rick Baker". SOME contributions.... like being Kong for, oh, about 90 percent of the movie!
I had a friend with me and didn't want to go home, so we saw The Main Event with Barabra Streisand instead. LOL! Scarred for life.
If you've ever seen the classic film "The Kentucky Fried Movie" he again wears an Ape costume that is named "Dino". It's pretty much his way of getting back at him. If you get the chance to see it, it's a pretty funny skit.
Yeah, it erked Rick Baker too. If you've ever seen the classic film "The Kentucky Fried Movie" he again wears an Ape costume that is named "Dino". It's pretty much his way of getting back at him. If you get the chance to see it, it's a pretty funny skit.
My mistake; you're correct. Rambaldi designed the two separate arms used in the close-up shots, but Glen Robinson supervised their construction.Actually, I believe Glen Robinson, a longtime Universal effects guy was in charge of all the closeup bits of Kong - the hand that picked up Jessica Lange, the head, etc. That stuff worked. Or at least it was more reliable.
Absolutely. De Laurentiis maintained the mechanical Kong was used throughout the film, and the lie was printed in article after article. Even after the film opened, many critics patted themselves on the back for being able to spot the difference between the mechanical Kong and Baker's Kong, even though many of them were completely wrong. I remember talking to people about the film in '76 who were completely fooled by the hype as well and believed they had seen a 40-foot mechanical Kong in most of the film--until I set them straight, of course. :coolI think that also had something to do with the film's promotion. As I recall, initially they were trying to say most of the footage was done with the full size mechanical Kong. That is, until it became patently obvious that it wasn't true (within the first few frames of Rick Baker in the suit).
It should be noted that, although Rambaldi designed and built the suit, Rick Baker sculpted the various faces used to make the outer latex skins for the mask.Rambaldi did make the complete suit. Rick just wore it, along with another guy for stunts.
Several heads were made for different looks. It was cable controlled, but cables kept breaking.
I still have my original making of book from 1976 (of the 1976 movie)
The large Kong lying dead was made of styrofoam, covered in horse hair, and came in parts. It was also almost destroyed by New Yorkers taking pieces of it as souvenirs the night of the shoot.
What about the 2 other Life-size Kongs from the Universal Studios, Fl, ride? Were those destroyed, too?
I don't know if they were saved, but they didn't have much substance--they were basically balloons with armatures inside. Seeing Kong deflated when the ride wasn't in operation must've been quite a sight.
As for the 1933 movie, this book is a must have. I still have my first edition from 1975:
]
When I cough this life-size Kong as a Circus act, I was quite disappointed at its limitations, but I still believed it was the coolest thing I had seen as a child.
He was part of a 20 minute live show, which retold the King Kong story. There was a Circus actress who played "the girl." Every time she had to interact with Kong, she had to be tied-up to cables hanging from the circus's ceiling frame. The girl will walk into Kong's open hand, which was also held by cables, and totally rely on the cables since Kong couldn't make a tight grip on her and, obviously, she could just fall off.
They had multiple shows daily. This was my very, very first encounter with a Hollywood prop/animatronic. Yes, the face was functional. I, literally, bugged my mom to take me, for a month, and dragged her to the show. A Major Hollywood prop was in town, and I HAD to see it.
I can't remember if Kong bent to put his hand on the ground for the girl to walk into, or if she was elevated to his extending arm. I can only remember she was easily able to access it, since it was always open, by default.
As a kid, I figured the prop was a "GIANT ROBOT." But to me, as an 8 year old, a giant robot was like the giant robots I used to watch in live action Japanese TV shows, such as UltraSeven, Ultraman, Giant Robo, and Animes, like Mazinger Z, Gaiking, etc. Full movement giant robots who moved like humans, and fought till death.
Having these kind of expectations, I was disappointed to see the Kong prop acting like a gigantic wind-up toy. I was hoping for THE GIANT ROBOT Kong to storm into stage, bang its chest, like a drum, and start destroying stuff. You know, like in the movie.
Quickly, I realized my expectations were far from what reality could deliver, so I dropped my expectations and just paid attention to the working prop. Every little thing it could do, no matter how poorly it did it, amazed me. It's the screen-used King Kong, and it is standing in front of me!
Balloons? Like an inflatable balloon you see at car dealers?
They looked like gigantic Audio-Animatronics. They moved their arms and faces.
They were more sophisticated than a car dealer balloon, but yes. They could move and such, but a blower offstage provided constant pressure to keep his skin taut. Without the bulk of padding, it kept the load down for all the animatronics and such.