Apparently not. You may write to me directly using my name in full (no spaces, no underlines, no dots etc, all as one word... @ A oh well (---you know the rest.!) Okay? Thank you. Paul
Yes, it comes down to "circle the wagons we have been defeated in the realm of debate on this matter so eject the Heathen".
A troll who knows the truth is not a "Troll".
Not at all. I have continually protested all of the juvenille behaior on here and even had JM Supp agree that much of this...
From the start I have stated there is an "Objective Truth" regarding this matter. How can a thread be: "thoroughly decent" when it is provably filled with deceit?
Not a single one of you hjs so much as entertained that this being an original is even so much as a possibility.
My continuing...
But the voluminous outright childishness is something that you are "good" with?
"Useful" Gregatron? To who exactly and to what end?
I have provided more than enough information to make all of you at the bare minimum doubt the veracity of those who continue to challenge my claims.
YES! Close this thread I agree!
This thread has been "ruined" because a person (myself) who actually knows the truth has outed all of you as a group think conglomerate of negative posers, who en-masse don't know all that much but wish they did.
Now that says a great deal about yourself sir.
Evidence As Presented:
1) Observe and note the compound curves the contours in image 3 #1 post. Show me any replica that has captured those elusive curves.
2) Why has no one mentioned the interior interchangeability of components.
3) The paint is 52 years old and paint oxidizes and...
But that observation is correct and you haven't denied that it is correct.
"Mods, please lock this thread." For you to make thaty request, what is it that scares you? Is it my having been sincere, honest and with a measure of humor, entertaining from the beginning, or is it that I have been...
No, I did not.
There were three individuals involved and they are all above reproach. All of you, each and every single one of you is ion effect saying:
"You (I) have 'this or that' to lose here" It is you people, collectively as in a group that are attempting what is known as "Face...
I have repeatedly noticed when the points I make about valid proof re: this Phaser being real, that proof is then ignored, and denied and the ad-hominem kid's gang swiftly re-appears.
Can any of you refute the proof as I have stated on here? Any of you?
As for the guy with the CAD...
Why is the collective childish behavior here entirely ignored (Group Think), while all of you simply (and in error) attack my point of view which in due time you will find out is the correct and accurate statement of fact? These responses truly are kid's stuff.
If any of you find that...
For that first comment thank you for noticing. For the second regarding substance, I see it has all escaped you. Maybe you'd benefit by going back to the beginning and read again?
"However, if there is a known group of specialists (so who exactly are these known and unamed "specialists'?) out there saying he is incorrect, then the item is not genuine, we are hurting his reputation. How many times does he scream that he demands to know why we won’t admit that is real...
Wow, you think I'm that good do you? (lol)
Because of its elongation characteristics compared with brass or 302 half hard stainless steel. two step is not "pretty much standard" as it is up tp customer specifications and supplied art work as to whether one, two, three, or even four stepped...