Well, I originally bought the Planet Replicas stl files with the intention of getting them 3D printed. When I opened them up in my 3D modeling software, I noticed tons of excess geometry and shapes that were not fully enclosed. I don't know a lot about 3D printing, but I do know that shapes must be "watertight" - no holes or missing polygons. So I started going over each part and cleaning them up as best I could. I quickly gave up on that and used the original parts as templates to build a new model from scratch. During this time, I discovered Glock's campaign to eliminate any airsoft guns or toys copying their look or design. There are still a few out there, but not many. I located a Glock 26 toy at a local convenience store and, as the barrel is just a bit shorter and the trigger and grip are very similar, I decided to base my Lawgiver on that. I had to modify only a couple of parts. I also realized that I'd have to do a lot of modification because a lot of the parts have thin walls (the thinnest approx. 1.5mm) which, from my research, would be a problem with 3D printing. This may not be as bad as I thought, but I was on a tight deadline and needed to be certain the first try would be relatively successful. I had some scrap mat board on hand that was about 1.5mm thick, so I set about rebuilding my new model in 1.5mm layers, similar to the stapler in the Medikit I did earlier. I converted the layers to vector art and printed them on paper, which I spray glued onto the mat board. After cutting the layers out, I was able to glue them together into a set of reasonable parts. They were a slight bit off, because the mat board wasn't exactly 1.5mm, but they were close enough to fit together with a little adjustment.
What I was intending on posting were cleaned up and organized versions of the vector art diagrams I created. I guess since the final parts this would allow the end user to create GREATLY resemble the parts that the original stl files would produce, that would be a breach of the agreement?