Exactly. Obviously if you write a film and you say *THE*(as in the ONE and only) T-1000 has a CPU chip... then you didn't watch T2. Flat against the floor, where's the chip? blown to tiny pieces.... where is the chip? :facepalm
Genisys :facepalm so much fail on so many levels.
Well it makes you wonder just how many times the writers and directors of the last 3 films watched T1 and T2. They all got many things very wrong.
Having said that, even JC, creator of this awesomeness made a few mistakes in his 2nd film when compared to the first.
Exactly. Obviously if you write a film and you say *THE*(as in the ONE and only) T-1000 has a CPU chip... then you didn't watch T2. Flat against the floor, where's the chip? blown to tiny pieces.... where is the chip? :facepalm
Genisys :facepalm so much fail on so many levels.
Since it is made up of teeny tiny "robots" if you will, and they all look alike, where would you hook up and chip/cable/USB/whatever? I would say programming it would have to be done wirelessly
I bought the IJ box set on BD and don't think I have even watched TCS yet. It wasn't the ants, rather the Tazan vine swinging that was a total WTF moment for me.
Like SW1, I want to pretend it never happened. That is was all just a really bad dream.
Terminator (in this film is called "Guardian" - actually he is called Pops) says in the film that the mimic-poly-alloy is safe without its chip. What chip and where does it get stored in something that can flatten out to be thinner than paper? As you have stated, there was nothing to say how or what controlled the T-1000. So I like the idea that is not one, but millions of nanos joined to form one.
Both the TX and now this ageing T-800 both have a chip and have both an endo + m-p-a.
You know, I always thought the T-X was a stepping stone prototype to the T-1000, primarily because it had the liquid metal covering an endoskeleton. The T-1000 is damn-near perfect in its design, because it can infiltrate areas just by being able to slide under a door or through a vent if it wanted to, where as a Terminator with an Endoskeleton, it would have to either go through a door or window, or break through a wall. Let's use this scenario: if a T-1000 had been sent back to 1984 instead of the T-800. It could have easily infiltrated the police station and kill Sarah Connor without any problems with minimal to no resistance. We already saw how the police station scenario played out in the film.
Not to mention, the T-1000 was better because it was practically unstoppable, where as all you'd need to stop a T-800 was to either blow it to smithereens, destroy its power cell, rip its head completely off or vaporize it with a phase-plasma rifle. Basically, the endoskeleton concept is even more flawed, especially with the T-X. Hell, we even see her endoskeleton weaponry got damaged in one scene.
Honestly, it was like the writer said, "I need to make sure the T-X has an endoskeleton, because that's the only way to be able to have the characters destroy it," without truly thinking about it.
That's just me, of course. I could be wrong with that opinion.
The T-1000 is damn-near perfect in its design, because it can infiltrate areas just by being able to slide under a door or through a vent if it wanted to
I love the T2 movie as much as anyone else here. But thinking logically, the T-1000 should have been able to smoke the good guys a bunch of times. It really only works as long as you don't stop and think about it long enough to pause the movie & go to the bathroom.
I love the T2 movie as much as anyone else here. But thinking logically, the T-1000 should have been able to smoke the good guys a bunch of times. It really only works as long as you don't stop and think about it long enough to pause the movie & go to the bathroom.
Same goes for John Conner in Genysis. My first thought when his Skynet identity was revealed was "wait, 5 minutes ago he disarmed guards and had two guns pointed at Kyle and Sarah while their backs were turned. Movie should have ended there."
Nope. Only SHOT one film but have been planning a trilogy to milk it as much as possible before the right reverts to Cameron in 2019. Hopefully those plans get scrapped(again, like with Salvation)
I would suppose that, in 2017, they (Skynet) hasn't developed the capability to make an actual T-1000. They know how, thanks to John, but it'd be like building a smartphone in 1800 - a lot of tools you'll need in order to make it will have to be built from scratch.
So the ones we saw in Skynet HQ may need a chip to operate, rather than having each molecule be a CPU. Call it a T-900, or a T-999 even. Not quite a T-1000
