Sorry man, no can do unfortunately.
Maybe a NDA?
I have high res to be able to see the depth of the cuts.
Maybe. But i would be interested in the reason "why" is someone sitting on "just pics" and not willing to share, if not for making money. (Not Scott, as he seems to speak about pics that he has no rights on - at least that´s what i want to believe of him)
And if that´s the reason, why not being upfront and saying "I´m not here for the community, just for taking advantage of the community"? That would at least be honest.
While I'm bound by an agreement in some cases, in others I simply would rather share certain things privately to people I know share the same passion, and aren't going to do exactly what you say people do Michael... profit from it. I've seen people pop up out of the woodwork overnight, and start selling things and marketing their expertise by taking the effort and work, and generosity of people who actually have a passion for this hobby and do the legwork with no credit, acknowledgment, or even thanks.
Thanks guys, everyone summed it up pretty well for me. I have photos of things I was given under confidence of discretion, and I respect that confidence and won't violate the trust given me. Also, I share and have shared everything I can many times in the past. If I were trying to just profit from it somehow, it would be obvious. I don't tout anything I do as superior or market myself as having secrets no one else has to profit... that's just ridiculous. I just want to do my best, and share with like minded people. I also, have spent money, time, and real effort to get my hands on images, props, parts, and relationships, only to have them used and represented as someone else's effort. I'm tired of it at times.
While I'm bound by an agreement in some cases, in others I simply would rather share certain things privately to people I know share the same passion, and aren't going to do exactly what you say people do Michael... profit from it. I've seen people pop up out of the woodwork overnight, and start selling things and marketing their expertise by taking the effort and work, and generosity of people who actually have a passion for this hobby and do the legwork with no credit, acknowledgment, or even thanks.
So anyway,... yes, I have some stuff others don't and I also have stuff everyone has, because I shared it all at one point of another in my own threads.
- - - Updated - - -
And again, thanks so much to sliuman for the awesome high res find and time capturing those images. It just confirms everything we suspected or knew with awesome new clarity!
And again, thanks so much to sliuman for the awesome high res find and time capturing those images. It just confirms everything we suspected or knew with awesome new clarity!
This definitely appears to be the same Upper, and possibly lock assembly as the ANH Hero! I agree that the lower was most likely changed for the ANH Hero. Not only do the machined features not match, but the spacers and such are attached to the left side, where the ANH frame had them on the right and showed no evidence of having anything mounted to the left side at at any point.
However, it is a bit odd that the lock assembly would fit into another mauser frame and still work properly, or even fit at all for that matter. I believe the frames and lock assemblies were machined to match each other to a certain extent. Almost like the side-plates on a Luger. But that does appear to be the same assembly nonetheless.
I know, Scott. That´s why i asked "why?" Was it your decision or was it a given info you were asked not to share?
In general - way to many vultures have popped up over the years in this hobby, to much "for money", and not "for fun".
There are the Imperial sidearm blasters -- the Merr-Sonns -- with evidence the resin castings had spacers on the left side of the receiver in those locations that were then sawn off. So both versions, and both from Bapty, saw some association with Star Wars production.
Why odd? This was a mass-produced, machine-fabricated pistol from a German company that had been making some of the better rifles in the world for a couple decades already. The whole point of mass-production is interchangeable bits. Absolutely a lock-frame assembly from one Mauser would fit another. Heck, the better-made German action will fit the Chinese .45ACP-chambered copies just fine. Certainly the differences between a Prewar Commercial and Wartime Commercial would be about the most minor. I'm not as familiar with the P.08 and its development evolution, but any non-interchangeability they experience isn't something Mauser dropped the ball on. The only things I know of where you need the right bits for the right guns are if you're dealing with one of the autopistol versions, or different chambering (9mm versus the standard 7.63mm).
--Jonah
Yeah, I have had 15-20 real Mausers so far, and while they were hand fitted and numbers matched.... SOME parts are interchangeable without modification. Others need filing or fitting.
...Now im looking for a steel scope mount, any help in the right direction would be appreciated.