This Rubies' Thor's Hammer replica retails for $14.99. This one just closed on ebay.
Thor Avengers movie hammer Mjolnir prop collectible costume disguise | eBay
This Rubies' Thor's Hammer replica retails for $14.99. This one just closed on ebay.
Thor Avengers movie hammer Mjolnir prop collectible costume disguise | eBay
Looks like there's a 133% stupid tax attached to that...
Good pictures and no real description, caveat emptor I suppose.
Ps - This is a 'Disguise' hammer, not Rubies.
You could say the name is in the listing title I suppose
Last edited by Alan Castillo; Jun 28, 2012 at 2:56 AM.
Does it squeak when the dog chews it? That is just nasty.
At that price I have another one they can have, a pair must be worth more
That shipping costs more than what I paid for mine at Target. I suspect a very angry person when that box is picked up.
wow, well I feel sorry for who ever actually paid for that
So who's going to send the buyer a message?
I actually tried to, but the buyer's ID was protected. He's gonna wig out when he finds out what he's done. I also hear a curious female voice asking, "Honey, how much did you pay for that?"
Wow that is bad. I have that same hammer I bought off Amazon, if your interested I'll sale mine for a discount.. $250.00 includes shipping
It's not been available for a couple of years now. eBay policy. You will only find out once feedback is left, and by that time, money would have naturally already changed hands. As I said, it still says 'disguise' in the title, and there is no misleading information at all in the listing. There is NO way this poor fellow is getting his/her money backMaskMaker said:
And most definitely this. It could well be a 'she' though, getting a pressie for the hubby / bf.MaskMaker said:
Last edited by Alan Castillo; Jun 28, 2012 at 4:24 PM. Reason: syntax
What the heck?! I wonder what his return policy is lol
When it arrives they will flip and probably open an
Item dispute. But they cannot claim item "not as described" as it was stated that it is "a Thor sword for costume or display". So the description was accurate, just vague. eBay might side with the seller as it is not their fault the buyer didn't ask more questions or research more.
Agreed. the buyer screwed himself. The seller made no claims that aren't 100% true. No questions were asked. I actually contacted the seller with my congratulations.
That is cold blooded
MaskMaker said:
Agreed. the buyer screwed himself. The seller made no claims that aren't 100% true. No questions were asked. I actually contacted the seller with my congratulations.
I did this once 13 years ago. (i think i did)
whats the current value of an unbuilt "23rd century tricorder" kit?
i paid $ 300 buy it now. I was told by some folks they were extremely rare.
after I got it: "what have I done"
The seller didn't do anything wrong here; he didn't lie, merely posted a vague listing. Opening bids were for less than the toy normally goes for, so it didn't have a minimum either. The bidders that drove the auction up were just sucked into that temporary blackhole where you think that bidding on something (and because other people want it, it must be "hot") without researching it is a great idea.
Some might call that a "lie of omission".booksandcorsets said:
Happens to the best of us.
http://www.therpf.com/f13/davinci-co...-diary-150949/
Looks like the seller used a sock puppet to bid up the price of it too.
I have a question as a seller on eBay...steveo said:
Why does everyone who sees a bidding war happen, automatically accuses the seller of shill bidding?
I have wars take place all the time, and sometimes the one bidder has zero or one feedback and people message me that they reported me. I just laugh it off and send them a nice message stating that everyone has to start at zero. We all did, and it would have sucked if I kept getting my early buds canceled because I have zero feedback. I give these people the benefit if the doubt, and I have been burned by zero scored people who never paid, but more often than not, they have come through.
So I was just curious why I always see people assuming this is what is ALWAYS going on?
Maybe there are just two crazy people caught up in the moment.
Reply with Quote
