Subscribe
  1. greatwazoo42's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2002
    From
    New Jersey
    Messages
    7,666
    Dec 12, 2012, 4:08 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #801

    Solo4114 said: View Post
    BOOOOOORING. What about the SPLOSIONS?!?!
    Mythbusters - Best explosions - YouTube
  2. Kerr Avon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2001
    Messages
    9,560
    Dec 12, 2012, 5:15 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #803

    Way too much effort expended there.
  3. greatwazoo42's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2002
    From
    New Jersey
    Messages
    7,666
    Dec 12, 2012, 5:47 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #804

    Kerr Avon said: View Post
    Way too much effort expended there.
    Oh like any of us have the ability to scoff at the way others use their free time. We argue semantics about holes (there's a porn joke in there someplace but I'm not gonna go looking) and the physical reactive properties of non-existant materials.
  4. Kerr Avon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2001
    Messages
    9,560
    Dec 12, 2012, 5:52 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #805

    Hey man, you can't have a hole in the wall if there's no wall to define where the hole is!!!
  5. greatwazoo42's Avatar
    Member Since
    May 2002
    From
    New Jersey
    Messages
    7,666
    Dec 12, 2012, 5:53 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #806

    Aw great! Now we gotta define the properties of the wall too! OK...how thick is the wall?
  6. NakedMoleRat's Avatar
    Member Since
    Aug 2003
    From
    Phoenix, AZ
    Messages
    3,134
    Dec 12, 2012, 5:53 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #807

    Well, I know one of the script doctors on this film.....found out he's put some time into it. I have higher kopes for it now!
  7. Tholian Commander RPF Premium Member Jeyl's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Asheville, NC
    Messages
    4,733
    Dec 12, 2012, 6:46 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #808

    I often wondered what JJ would say to new fans who got into Star Trek thanks to his movie. Well, here it is.

    "The thing about the movie that I love also is that we didn't even make it for fans of the first movie we did. A lot of sequels I've seen tend to assume you love the characters and know them really well and get things off to a fast start where you don't have any sense of investing in the characters in the beginning, so we tried to treat this as a movie that works on its own."
    What is going on? It's like he was forced to do this one task in trying to grab an audience he thought he could not reach, and when he does it with success (I'll admit Trek09 was a financial and critical success), he says screw it. For the next movie, we don't need to rely on anything from the previous one.

    Cripes, was that ever a complaint about the Lord of the Rings trilogy? They introduce us to the characters and the perils that await them and hope that the audience will care enough to watch the next installment. He speaks as though that's some 'hollywood' thing when in reality I can actually see it being a challenge that Peter Jackson and his crew needed to over come. We've got to commit an audience to these characters for multiple movies, because if that doesn't work, it's done.

    Even the original series movies, intended or not, had strong connections with each other. I'm sure everyone remembers how TWOK, TSFS, TVH and TUC all connect with each other in continuing each other's themes, and for good reason. They mattered to the characters. Kirk's son was murdered by the Klingons for nothing, Spock was brought back to life, the original Enterprise was destroyed, the Klingons hatred of Kirk and Kirk's hatred of the klingons. I'll even throw TMP in the list for introducing us to the epic beauty that is the Enterprise refit. They didn't try to avoid each other in order to 'stand on their own', they complimented each other. From TMP all the way to TUC (I skip TFF) you got pretty big epic journey that was quite coherent. I loved that.

    I just can't imagine anyone.....GAH! If I was handed the keys to a franchise that is respected and loved by many, I would not be talking like this. I would say something like "I want to add something new to this franchise that the fans can respect and newcomers can enjoy. Not just make something stand on it's own to the point that it doesn't need anything else but something that when watched by new viewers, they'll go "That is was really interesting. I think I might get into this series." That's not what I get from JJ. All I get is someone who just wants to make a movie and move on. Nothing wrong with that, but he shouldn't make it so obvious before the movie is even released.
  8. Tholian Commander RPF Premium Member Jeyl's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Asheville, NC
    Messages
    4,733
    Dec 12, 2012, 6:51 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #809

    NakedMoleRat said: View Post
    Well, I know one of the script doctors on this film.....found out he's put some time into it. I have higher kopes for it now!
    With a script partly written by Damon Lindelof? You better believe there's going to be time put into it.
  9. Angelus Lupus's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Kent, UK
    Messages
    1,350
    Dec 12, 2012, 7:09 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #810

    Jeyl said: View Post
    I often wondered what JJ would say to new fans who got into Star Trek thanks to his movie. Well, here it is.
    ...
    Every time JJ opens his mouth to talk about Trek, he reminds me why I wish someone else (anyone else) had been put in charge of New Trek.
  10. RPF Premium Member Caveneau's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Toronto
    Messages
    1,524
    Dec 12, 2012, 9:29 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #811

    Angelus Lupus said: View Post
    Every time JJ opens his mouth to talk about Trek, he reminds me why I wish someone else (anyone else) had been put in charge of New Trek.
    I agree with this totally. I'll never forget seeing an interview with JAbrams(that's what I call him)back in 2009 for the first one, when asked about his relationship with the Star Trek franchise growing up, his response was simply 'I never really got it'
  11. Kerr Avon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2001
    Messages
    9,560
    Dec 12, 2012, 9:31 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #812

    That REALLY explains the results.
  12. RPF Premium Member Caveneau's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Toronto
    Messages
    1,524
    Dec 12, 2012, 9:44 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #813

    Seriously, I'll never ever forget that comment he made. Funny, I never liked him even prior to hearing that. He didn't seem that humbled to have been passed the torch on such a uniquely legendary franchise. Instead it was this attitude of playing it off as if it's just another movie, which for him, I'm sure it was.

    I'm sure now the comments would be along the lines of how much respect he has for the franchise. Whatever JAbrams.

    I'll be the first to admit....I'm still going to see it anyway.
  13. Kerr Avon's Avatar
    Member Since
    Feb 2001
    Messages
    9,560
    Dec 12, 2012, 9:46 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #814

    I'll see it when I can stream it on Netflix, I won't even waste a spot in my DVD queue with it.
  14. RPF Premium Member Caveneau's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Toronto
    Messages
    1,524
    Dec 12, 2012, 9:58 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #815

    Well I'm sure JAbrams just wants to get Star Trek finished so he can move on to producing the Cloverfield sequel and another Mission Impossible.

    I'm sure he's not the first director to do this, but how long has Hollywood been releasing trailers for movies that are not even technically completed post-production? Is this a fairly new thing within the last 5-10 years?
  15. PotionMistress's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2011
    From
    Midwest USA
    Messages
    764
    Dec 12, 2012, 10:19 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #816

    Caveneau said: View Post
    I agree with this totally. I'll never forget seeing an interview with JAbrams(that's what I call him)back in 2009 for the first one, when asked about his relationship with the Star Trek franchise growing up, his response was simply 'I never really got it'

    Oh jeeeezzzz! I didn't know he said that! uGH.... I feel queezy!
  16. RPF Premium Member Caveneau's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Toronto
    Messages
    1,524
    Dec 12, 2012, 10:27 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #817

    Yeah, I swear that's what he said. I'll be damned if I can remember the exact interview where it was said. Yup, that's what made me angry to begin with. After that I give the no praise at all. He lucked out getting passed the torch to the Trek franchise, he obviously has some very influential friends.

    You know these kind of directors are sensationalists. They pretentiously move from one project to the next, everyone praising them for how great they are, yet really just 'average' grade quality. Unfortunately, these days being associated with a few successful projects pretty much guarantees you future success. They'd really have to botch up the next film or tick off someone powerful to fall from grace. Mediocrity is rampant these days.
    Last edited by Caveneau; Dec 12, 2012 at 10:28 PM. Reason: swearing
  17. DARTH SABER's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2002
    From
    Miami
    Messages
    8,566
    Dec 12, 2012, 10:50 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #818

    On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst....how much do you guys hate the new trek, and what do you equate the experience of watching it with?
  18. SSgt Burton's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Canada
    Messages
    2,305
    Dec 12, 2012, 10:54 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #819

    Is it possible that Abrams is simply trying to say that his "sequel" will work as a "stand alone" movie?

    In other words you didn't have to watch Trek '09 (or "any" Trek) to "get" the plot of the new film?

    Is that possible?


    I believe back in 09 Abrams said that he never watched Trek, not that he never "got it."


    Nicholas Meyer never watched a single episode of Trek either.


    I will say that Abrams "does" come off as a completely arrogant ass most of the time.


    The whole point of "Science Fiction" is to foster an interest in "Science".
    I would agree that one of the great things about "Star Trek" is that it inspires people to become astronauts, engineers, scientists, doctors etc...

    However the whole point of "science fiction" is to take a moral dilemma (or potential crisis) facing our World "today" and wrap it up in a "futuristic story" in order to have the audience ponder the dilemma without feeling like they have been preached to.

    Science Fiction is at its best when it is an allegory of modern life.

    "The Time Machine" (in my humble opinion) is one of the best science fiction allegories about the Industrial Revolution, however I certainly don't think it was written to "inspire" anyone into becoming a scientist.

    That said, do I think Abrams Trek aspires to be "great" sci-fi?

    Of course not!


    However even old Star Trek doesn't "always" acheive that greatness. Sometimes they knock it out of the park with City of the Edge, Let That Be Your Last Battlefield, The Measure of a Man etc...

    And sometimes you get a Way to Eden or Samaritan Snare.


    Unfortunately Trek went the way of the Dodo when it came to telling those compelling "hard sci-fi" stories a long time ago (like... decades ago for me), opting instead for the "cool story"/entertainment factor.



    Kevin
  19. SSgt Burton's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Canada
    Messages
    2,305
    Dec 12, 2012, 11:05 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #820

    DARTH SABER said: View Post
    On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst....how much do you guys hate the new trek, and what do you equate the experience of watching it with?
    Oh this ought to be good.


    Let's see... if you were to ask me this question back in May of 2009, I would have said it rated a 10 and likened it to watching an episode of "Jackass."

    I hated it with a passion!

    Since then (and believe it or not it was something "you" said about the new film Darth Saber) I gave it a second chance and saw it more for what it was- entertainment. I'd give it a "4" now on the hater scale. The easiest thing to liken it to is watching "First Contact"- a "fun" entertaining Trek film, but certainly not Trek at its best.

    Something "non" Trek? Pretty much any James Cameron film- a fun, action filled roller coaster that can make you laugh and cry, but doesn't really require much thought.


    Kevin
  20. RPF Premium Member Caveneau's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Toronto
    Messages
    1,524
    Dec 12, 2012, 11:07 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #821

    Oh I'm quite positive he said 'I never really got it'. I never forget why I begrudge people for saying certain things. . I even remember thinking to myself at the time 'what do you mean, you never really got it?? However, I have not doubt he also mentioned not having watched Trek as a kid.

    Like I've said, I'll probably end up going to see it anyway. I just don't like JAbrams. If it wasn't Trek, I sure as heck wouldn't be going out to see it.
    SSgt Burton said: View Post
    I believe back in 09 Abrams said that he never watched Trek, not that he never "got it."
  21. nickytea's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2001
    From
    Southern California
    Messages
    3,365
    Dec 13, 2012, 12:39 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #822

  22. SSgt Burton's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Canada
    Messages
    2,305
    Dec 13, 2012, 12:57 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #823

  23. nickytea's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2001
    From
    Southern California
    Messages
    3,365
    Dec 13, 2012, 1:03 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #824

    Some things deserve a second look.
  24. RPF Premium Member CessnaDriver's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2005
    Messages
    7,015
    Dec 13, 2012, 1:05 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #825

    DARTH SABER said: View Post
    On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst....how much do you guys hate the new trek, and what do you equate the experience of watching it with?

    How much?



    Sterilize! Ster-il-ize!!!!


    Equate? We are talking Crystal Skull level raping.

Similar Threads

  1. Star Trek Into Darkness (Post-release)
    Vivek, Entertainment and Movie Talk
    Replies: 1659
    Last Post: Jun 23, 2014, 9:59 AM
  2. Star Trek Into Darkness replicas
    alienscollection.com, Replica Props
    Replies: 162
    Last Post: Dec 24, 2013, 11:23 PM
  3. Help:Star Trek Into Darkness accessories
    mb1701d, Replica Costumes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug 15, 2013, 1:29 PM
  4. Star Trek Into Darkness Kirk
    nickytea, Replica Costumes
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Jul 26, 2013, 3:33 PM