Page 1 of 118 1234561151 ... LastLast
Subscribe
  1. Formerly Tempus RPF Premium Member Dave Porter's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    From
    Vanishing Point
    Messages
    743
    Nov 25, 2011, 10:30 AM - Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #1

    http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/25...el-pushed-back

    May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to this article.

    GI Joe 2 is going into its spot.
  2. RPF Premium Member phase pistol's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2002
    From
    New York
    Messages
    15,124
    Nov 25, 2011, 10:35 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #2

    Not at all surprising. The first film was pushed back from 2008 to 2009.

    I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .

    K
  3. MooCriket's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Baltimore MD
    Messages
    6,923
    Nov 25, 2011, 11:15 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #3

    I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
  4. RPF Premium Member phase pistol's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2002
    From
    New York
    Messages
    15,124
    Nov 25, 2011, 11:24 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #4

    Sparkly!
  5. neosporing's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2005
    From
    Kent Ohio (wish it was Negril Jamaica)
    Messages
    1,220
    Nov 25, 2011, 11:25 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #5

    phase pistol said: View Post
    I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .

    K
    QFT
  6. RPF Premium Member darth_myeek's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2007
    Messages
    1,425
    Nov 25, 2011, 11:29 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #6

    MooCriket said: View Post
    I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lens flare.
    More lens flare!

    and definitely more Keenser.
  7. Formerly Tempus RPF Premium Member Dave Porter's Avatar
    Member Since
    Nov 2009
    From
    Vanishing Point
    Messages
    743
    Nov 25, 2011, 12:37 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #7

    MooCriket said: View Post
    I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
    Nice
  8. Solo4114's Avatar
    Member Since
    Dec 2001
    Messages
    6,291
    Nov 25, 2011, 12:40 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #8

    MooCriket said: View Post
    I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
    Actually, I heard the film has already been shot, but post-production to remove the previously added lens flare is taking longer than expected. Thus, the delay.
  9. CB2001's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 2009
    From
    Madison, Florida
    Messages
    5,199
    Nov 25, 2011, 12:58 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #9

    MooCriket said: View Post
    I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
    Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why Abrams insists on having so much lens flare? I mean, I haven't found any answer as to why he's so infatuated with it.
  10. RPF Premium Member CessnaDriver's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2005
    Messages
    6,960
    Nov 25, 2011, 1:09 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #10

    I swore I saw STII in 82 though.

    :P
  11. RPF Premium Member phase pistol's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2002
    From
    New York
    Messages
    15,124
    Nov 25, 2011, 1:19 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #11

    I had read somewhere that Abrams was so taken with the idea that the Enterprise was brand new, and that the Star Trek future was so "bright and hopeful", that he just went nuts with those lens flares (which were for the most part done on-set by shining lights directly into the camera lens from just out of frame - not a an effect added in post).

    Since the release though Abrams has admitted that maybe he went a little overboard on the flares.

    k
  12. RPF Premium Member GeneralFROSTY's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jul 2003
    Messages
    3,905
    Nov 25, 2011, 2:01 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #12

    Im a continuity freak.
    Im really hoping we don't see re-designed uniforms and sets. I rather enjoyed the way everything looked, despite what the haters have to say on the matter.
  13. RPF Premium Member
    Member Since
    Aug 2002
    From
    Mr. Masters Tidal Pool
    Messages
    17,470
    Nov 25, 2011, 2:14 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #13

    Hopefully it will be pushed back untill 2050 that way if I'm still around I won't care by then!



    Tempus said: View Post
    http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/25...el-pushed-back

    May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to this article.

    GI Joe 2 is going into its spot.
  14. micdavis is offline micdavis
    Nov 25, 2011, 2:15 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #14

    So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

    Congrats.
  15. SSgt Burton's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Canada
    Messages
    2,299
    Nov 25, 2011, 2:59 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #15

    phase pistol said: View Post
    I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .
    A better story would be nice too, but I'm saving my money this round.


    Kevin
  16. RPF Premium Member
    Member Since
    Aug 2002
    From
    Mr. Masters Tidal Pool
    Messages
    17,470
    Nov 25, 2011, 3:14 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #16

    No way Jose!

    You know what Scotty once said, "Fool me once......


    micdavis said: View Post
    So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

    Congrats.
  17. CB2001's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 2009
    From
    Madison, Florida
    Messages
    5,199
    Nov 25, 2011, 4:01 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #17

    apollo said: View Post
    No way Jose!

    You know what Scotty once said, "Fool me once......
    But he also said to over-estimate things so that when you pull things off right like you should, you look like a miracle worker.
  18. MooCriket's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    Baltimore MD
    Messages
    6,923
    Nov 25, 2011, 7:23 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #18

    I would love to see Bones get more screen time. Urban would have made Kelley proud with how closely he played the role to the original character.
  19. RPF Premium Member thegreatgalling's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 2009
    From
    USA
    Messages
    3,233
    Nov 25, 2011, 8:50 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #19

    ^ Agreed times ten. If this film doesn't FOCUS on the trilogy that is Spock, Kirk and McCoy, I WILL throw a plush Tribble at the screen.

    Obv. the delay isn't great to hear, unless it translates to quality.
  20. Formerly cobalt crimson Wes R's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2010
    From
    Western PA
    Messages
    10,137
    Nov 26, 2011, 1:23 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #20

    Must be bad if it was pushed back and another steaming pile of crap put in its place lol.
  21. JBReplicas's Avatar
    Member Since
    Apr 2005
    Messages
    1,950
    Nov 26, 2011, 5:42 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #21

    I seriously don't see them re-re-designing the enterprise, I think we have to live with the one they have given us, although if it gets blown to bits then we can all start hoping they'll dust off the TMP refit again
  22. Chara limit is way too sm RPF Premium Member Nwerke's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2003
    From
    'Straya, maaaate!
    Messages
    4,856
    Nov 26, 2011, 7:40 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #22

    CommanderCody said: View Post
    I seriously don't see them re-re-designing the enterprise, I think we have to live with the one they have given us, although if it gets blown to bits then we can all start hoping they'll dust off the TMP refit again
    Yes please. Story-wise, just blow the engines off in a fight. Put 'new improved' ones on it, ones that look less like a kitsch sex toy. Reduce the pylon angle at the same time; don't even bother with an explanation, nobody will care and anyone with an ounce of taste will be grateful.

    Also, build an engine room set, FFS.

    micdavis said: View Post
    So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

    Congrats.
    I'll have an extra year to look forward to it and will go and see it two or three times. The first Abrams movie saved Star Trek, let's face it.

    No, really. It did.
  23. Mole's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    From
    UK
    Messages
    260
    Nov 26, 2011, 7:47 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #23

    LOL! I didn't even notice the flares in Kirk's eyes!

    Needs more Bones! Urban was without a doubt the best thing in the last Trek film.

    And I wouldn't be against them recasting Scotty. I think Pegg is brilliant but he was totally miscast in this.
  24. CB2001's Avatar
    Member Since
    Jun 2009
    From
    Madison, Florida
    Messages
    5,199
    Nov 26, 2011, 9:14 AM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #24

    Mole said: View Post
    LOL! I didn't even notice the flares in Kirk's eyes!

    Needs more Bones! Urban was without a doubt the best thing in the last Trek film.

    And I wouldn't be against them recasting Scotty. I think Pegg is brilliant but he was totally miscast in this.
    I agree with everyone that they got Bones right. I thought Pegg was okay, considering that there's not many other actors these days that I think could even remotely capture Scotty very well (seriously I can't think of one). Spock, I'm still a little iffy on. Sulu, I'm also iffy on. I say they need to recast Uhura (seriously, Uhura had way too much attitude in comparison to the original Uhura that she doesn't remotely invoke any similarity in appearance or attitude) and Kirk (no offense to Chris Pine. I thought he did a great job in Bottle Shock and in Unstoppable, but he just doesn't scream Kirk to me).
  25. Member Since
    Jan 2003
    Messages
    2,780
    Nov 26, 2011, 6:29 PM - re: Star Trek Into Darkness (Pre-release) #25

    When they push a movie back it's because they know it sucks.

    And it takes a lot for them to notice.

Similar Threads

  1. Star Trek Into Darkness (Post-release)
    Vivek, Entertainment and Movie Talk
    Replies: 1659
    Last Post: Jun 23, 2014, 8:59 AM
  2. Star Trek Into Darkness replicas
    alienscollection.com, Replica Props
    Replies: 162
    Last Post: Dec 24, 2013, 10:23 PM
  3. Help:Star Trek Into Darkness accessories
    mb1701d, Replica Costumes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Aug 15, 2013, 12:29 PM
  4. Star Trek Into Darkness Kirk
    nickytea, Replica Costumes
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Jul 26, 2013, 2:33 PM